Showing posts with label beaucoup kevin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beaucoup kevin. Show all posts

Monday, April 28, 2008

I rant about the "OpenSource Boob Project"

Yes, I am one of the last to tackle this topic. After Get Off The Internet, Beaucoup Kevin,  Occasional Superheroine, The Beat and almost countless others have said what they had to say. I thought I said all I had to say about it in my comments on Val's blog, but I felt compelled to write more about it here.

What is the Open-Source Boob Project? Read more about it here but this is the gist of it:

The Open-Source Boob Project.

At Penguicon, we had buttons to give away. There were two small buttons, one for each camp: A green button that said, "YES, you may" and a red button that said "NO, you may not." And anyone who had those buttons on, whether you knew them or not, was someone you could approach and ask:

"Excuse me, but may I touch your breasts?"

And if you weren't a total lout - the women retained their right to say no, of course - they would push their chests out, and you would be allowed into the sanctity of it. That exchange of happiness where one person are told with gropes and touches that they are desirable and the other is someone who's allowed to desire.

For a moment, everything that was awkward about high school would fade away and you could just say what was on your mind. It was as though parts of me were being healed whenever I did it, and I touched at least fifteen sets of boobs at Penguicon. It never got old, surprisingly.

Some women didn't want to. That was fine. We never demanded anything of anyone. And if you didn't want to put yours up for the Project but you wanted to touch, well, that was fine, too. It was simply for folks who felt like being open.

It was a raging success at Penguicon.... And there haven't been any hookups that I know of thanks to the Open-Source Boob Project. It is, as I said, a very special thing. (Though I wouldn't rule it out if two single people exchanged a moment.) And we'll probably do it at other cons, because it's strangely wholesome and sexual at the same time.

I've left off the names, because frankly, people should reveal for themselves whether they're Open-Sourcers or not. Not everyone wants to go public with it, and what happens at the con stays at the con. But trust me. If you are, and I meet you, I will ask. And you'll understand the beauty and simplicity of the Open-Source Boob Project for yourself.

Touch the magic, my friends. Touch the magic.

Yes! A geek's glory land! Being able to touch a woman's boob without dinner and a movie first! Or even showering!

I have these few tips for anybody who thinks that this is a good idea:

  1. It's not
  2. No, really, it's not.
  3. Not every woman wants their boobs touched.
  4. Those that do might be coming from a wide variety of reasons. They are not all free thinkers who are comfortable with their bodies. So don't think that if someone doesn't want to have their boobs touched that means something is wrong with them. 
  5. Couching your 'feeling girls up' project in new age-y jargon doesn't take a way from the fact that the whole point of the project is so you can get your rocks off by feeling a woman's boobs.
  6. Don't try to deny it. You don't need to touch a woman's breasts to say her body is beautiful. You want to touch her breasts so you can touch her breasts.
  7. Backpedaling by saying that people have misconstrued your "healing" and "wholesome" breast touching ritual and turned it to a lewd and perverted breast touching ritual doesn't really work. These people might be perverts, but they cut to the gist of your ideas.
  8. And for those who think this misguided idea, which gives women a choice in the matter, allows you to just go up to any woman any a convention and cop a feel, you are really, really, REALLY mistaken. I feel sorry for your groin, which will probably be kicked. A LOT.
  9. Anybody at a convention who comes up and grabs my wife's boobs will be power bombed through a table.
  10. By HER, not ME.
  11. If you are so socially maladjusted that the only way you can touch boobs is starting up a program where the willing will allow you to touch their boobs, might I suggest going to a strip club. The less reputable the better. Think BYOB. Sure, you have less money for Star Trek prop replicas and almost naked Japanese vinyl figurines, but, with the right stripper on the right night, you will be able to touch all the boobs you want.
  12. Or better yet, how about you start treating women with dignity and respect. Treat them like human beings. Then you might actually get a girlfriend who would let you touch her boobs all the time. Yes, yes, I know. You'd have to start brushing your teeth and showering, and you'd have even less money for Star Trek prop replicas and mostly naked Japanese vinyl figurines and you'll be limited to only one pair of breasts for an extended period of time, but there are other benefits, like having someone care if you live or died.

See, I have a circle of friends where we come up with some wacky, off the wall ideas. But we usually keep these ideas to ourselves. We don't present these wacky, off the wall ideas to the general public where they will be viewed out of context and interpreted differently than we intended. That being said, theferret is either deluded or less suave than he thinks he is. Because as much as he tries to couch his groping in an intellectual way, in a way which he wants to appear is empowering to women, he is still trying to cop a feel of random women's boobies. And even though the women in his circle of friends do not think that's offensive, it doesn't mean that it's wrong for another woman to think it is.

 



Sunday, April 6, 2008

Bill's Insomniac Comic Re-Dialogue Theater: Mighty Avengers #11

Hello all,

By now, you should have heard about the controversy that Brian Michael Bendis' dialogue for Dr. Doom in a recent Mighty Avengers caused. Here it is if you missed it.

 

Ouch! Fat Piece of Furniture? Cow mouth? Whore's Heart? This does not sound like the Doom we all know and love!

Anyway you slice it, it is still a pretty bad piece of dialogue. And what's especially odd is that Bendis usually is pretty good with dialogue.

Kevin Church has a more Doom worthy dialoguing effort. But I believe we should go in a different direction. Not only should Doom speak out of character, but he should speak as an entirely different character:

 

Victor Von Doom as played by Corky St. Clair. I think this is what Bendis was going for.



Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Fight! Fight! Fight!

I hate it when Mommy and Daddy fight.

That is, if the Mommy is Valerie D'Orazio and Daddy is Kevin Church.

There is a bit of a feud going on, well, if you can call Kevin's sniping at Valerie in his blog here and in the blind item here a "feud".

Why can't we all get along? I mean, seriously, why can't we all get along? Is there some reason why, Kevin, that out of the blue, twice in the same week, you make snippy posts concerning Val's website? Is there some reason why Chris "I loves me some kicks to the face in my comics" Sims comes of sounding like a humorless anger monger in the comments? Or that Mike Sterling tells another commenter to "piss off"? Is there some insidious secret about Val that these folks know that I, the casual reader of her blog, don't?  

I'm serious about this. I read each of the above bloggers daily, and enjoy all of what I read. So, I really can't understand the sniping. I think it is more than a bit unwarranted, which leads me to believe that there is a story behind the story.

Granted, Val's locking down her comments after a a rugby scrum with a poster, which Church mentioned in the blind item, was a bit harsh. I mean, the guy didn't seem overly trollish. I wondered at the time if there wasn't a history between Val and the poster. But Church's response was equally as harsh. He essentially called her a glory hog (which was a bit of a pot/kettle situation.)

And the latest, where Church points out the similarities between a post of hers about getting better hits for your website from search engines and a post of his about getting better hits for your website from search engines. I think this is ticky tacky. Because, trust me, no one would want to plagarize a post about getting better hits for your website from search engines. And, I'd imagine, that there are only a limited amount of ways to get better hits for your websites from search engine, so there would be carry over in any post.

But seriously, I want to know why three bloggers I enjoy reading have a beef with a fourth blogger I enjoy reading. Can't someone get to the bottom of this?